vesterberg.se Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the vesterberg.se

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host vesterberg.se. Currently, hosted in Sweden and its service provider is FSD Internet Tjanster AB .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

solving problems, finding new ways – applied systems thinking home systems thinking resources work interests electronics electric bass about help swedish texts system dynamics course again march 21, 2010 | 1:38 pm i have been quite busy the last months. besides my economic studies i am taking two distance courses related to system dynamics. one is a macroeconomic course the uses system dynamics to explain economic market behaviour. i will write a post about that course later. the other course is called system dynamics ii given from portland state university (usa). system dynamics ii is an advanced course that has a seminar-type approach, where students prepare and present portions of the content. course literature is sterman’s book, business dynamics. the application areas emphasize economics and business, but other important and interesting subjects has also been discussed. some of the topics has been model testing, policy analysis, dynamics of growth, the spread of disease, and diffusion of innovation. we have gone deeper into modelling of delays, co-flows, ageing chains, non-linear relationships, decision-making, human behaviour, forecasting, supply chains, and business cycles. with just the project assignment left i can say i have learned a lot. i have been the only distance student. unfortunately we could not arrange for synchronous participating on my part in the discussion sessions, but discussing through list and listening to recorded sessions has worked out very well. the teacher, professor wayne wakeland, has been a great help and inspiration. other posts about this subject you might want to read: system dynamics learnings so far mit opencourseware sd lecture notes system dynamics video course updates on the system dynamics course comments 2 comments » categories uncategorized tags system dynamics comments rss trackback absorbing variety september 21, 2009 | 7:06 pm a frustrated customer some weeks ago i bought an economics book that also had an useful web resource. enclosed was a key to access the resource. it tried to use it and login, but did not succeed. i contacted the support and it took several emails back and forth to understand that the key could not be used. since their web shop had no button to add this web resource item to my basket, i asked them how i could buy such a key. they redirected me to sales. yet another email, this time to sales. sales department could not find the isbn number in their canadian system and therefore could not give me a price. period. that was all. how hard can it be? here i was, a customer fighting to buy an item! i gave up. standardized services this led me to think about services and their design. the above has happened many times in different situations. in the name of effectiveness and optimization i am forced to fill in standardized forms or talk to people that can handle only one type of questions. sometimes i have to talk to an dumb automated teller without pardon. why can’t i be guided to the right answer by a real person? services are designed with the assumption that 1) problems can be a categorized and 2) the customer can understand this categorization. in real life there is variety and the problem told, might be hiding the real one. what is the real result of this categorized service? people call again and ask questions. are the customers slow to understand? is the problem on the customer side? should we optimize the categorization? no! failure demand service design seems to be guided by factory thinking. usually the intelligence is put in an information system. this way, standardization can be applied by specialized service people. but this factory thinking, this system (encompassing much more than the it system), hinders variety and create unhappy customers. it creates a demand of help or more information because of failures. absorbing variety we should accept that variety is part of life and design the services accordingly. you may react: we cannot afford that! but what if the unnecessary questions, the “failure demand”, actually generate a lot of unnecessary work? this waste of time could have been avoided if the customer got all the help he wanted at first contact. real people are the best absorbers of variety. when designing services, the workers that meet the customer should handle as much as possible and be a guide to the solution. this generates happy and returning customers. comments 2 comments » categories thinking tags diversity , lean thinking , mana , management , service design comments rss trackback what i offer september 6, 2009 | 6:27 pm applying the observant reader has noticed a change in the title of this blog. do you see the change? i have changed it because i want to emphasize the application of systems thinking even more. thinking high and lofty thoughts are not enough. i am interested in changing the way things are to the better. one reader asked me: what do you offer? i gave it a thought. i like to solve problems and find new ways. as a consultant i have many years of experience of building it-systems to solve problems. but there is a bigger perspective. information technology can produce a lot of “waste”; information that does not add real value. they can also just reinforce bad ways of doing things. it is better to do right things than to do less of wrong things. you are in a situation and you are not satisfied. there is a problem, an undesired behaviour or you want to move on and find new ways of doing things. how can you proceed? system behaviour when we are looking for solutions, we have a tendency to single out one or two possible causes and attempt to correct them. we fail to see the big perspective and because of this, our solution does not lead to long-term change. it is as if what we trying to change have an inherent resistance to change. after a while things revert to the old conditions or get worse. we fail to see that material and immaterial things around us: habits, machines, people, programs, attitudes and culture are connected to each other and form a system. different parts of this system depend on each other and interact. it is the system that probably produces the undesired behaviour and not a single part, a single process or a single person. i can help you to identify the relevant perspective. we have a tendency to focus on certain details (abstractions) for optimization. this can be negative for other parts and for the whole. what we call side-effects are ordinary effects, just like the effects we desire. the abstraction exists only in our minds. for example, we have focused on transportation and considered pollution a side-effect. but this “side-effect” is biting us badly now. time we need to increase the boundaries of the area we study and take into account the time factor. systems have inertia and different parts interact through feedback. changing one part might produce something unexpected in another part. consequences might take a sudden turn and not behave as nice and calm as we thought. we should recognize properties of connections and relationships as having real importance, just like the properties of the parts. some strenghts only exist because of relationships. people are not like a container of competence that you can move around. we often talk about employees as resources. if you reorganize, have you considered what will happen with the relationships of trust within groups of people? leverage points there are places in this mix of parts and connections where you can get the most long term change with minimal effort. these points are sometimes not so obvious and perhaps counter-intuitive. the discipline systems thinking calls these places leverage points. efficient problem solving is done by studying the whole system and finding the leverage points. i can help you to find these leverage points. problem solving can result in a redesign of a system. it can also mean that we learn to navigate more efficiently in a system we cannot change. actually we can control much less of our environment than we think. how to do it there is a practical approach of how to efficiently solve problems. it can be done with a series of meetings or modelling sessions where a group of people together with a facilitator meet. the facilitator guides the group through the process and together they co-create the solution. the outcome might be a process map, a vision statement, an informational model or just a bunch of good ideas. the dialogue during the sessions is very important. the journey is just as valuable as the result. by working together a shared view of the problem and the solution is built. i can help you by guiding you through the problem solving sessions. computer model the system dynamics discipline takes it a step further by attempting to make a computer model of the relevant part of the system. during the modelling sessions we build a flight simulator where different policies that can be tested and evaluated. it may sound strange that is can be useful to build computer models with “soft” variables. but even a limited model is of great value, since during the work hidden assumptions are made visible. a shared “live” graphical model says more than thousands words and can be of great help in to learn to think systemic in a situation. so what do i offer? i offer you help in solving problems and finding new ways by applying systems thinking. comments 2 comments » categories thinking tags dialogue , learning , management , simulation , systems dynamics , systems thinking comments rss trackback tell me your story august 29, 2009 | 4:00 pm i find it interesting to follow blogs which are personal, especially if they reflect personal trials and learnings. a story tells much more than a bulleted resume. we have overconfidence in conveying a message by presenting facts and would rather present ourselves as “ready” and perfectly fitting for a job, than someone who is in the making, who makes mistakes and learns. stories give context for the facts and bring in emotions. you become alive to the listener. stories are what people remember. it might be what distinguishes you from the rest. yes, telling facts are important, but also tell what you are passionate about, tell how things came to be as they are. and make authenticity a guiding star in your talk. we all have stories about our life that is a mix of many years of experience, thought and emotion and they are important. you take a risk when you are personal and transparent, but do it anyway. ever since we lived in caves we have communicated through stories and the digital age has not removed this need. on the contrary the need for an emotional context has increased, because today information is so abundant and easy accessible. so, tell me your story. comments 2 comments » categories thinking comments rss trackback coming together – creating ideas august 24, 2009 | 7:01 pm creative conversations a few days ago i had a very nice talk with a friend. it was an inspiring and energizing talk and some ideas were born inside me. actually some thoughts went off like bombs on the inside of me. it was what i call a “creative conversation”. they happen every now and then and are very precious. i am sure you have recognized that some thoughts passing through you mind are light and some thoughts are heavy, dense and full of substance. some talking we do is just like chatter, it passes unnoticed and some talking creates things in a powerful way. i have noticed that together with some people under the right circumstances there is like a magic in the middle. things are born. ideas are created. creative conversations cannot be controlled, but they occur in an atmosphere with certain ingredients. we can try to arrange an environment that invites it. plenty of un-thougt ideas i believe there are many ideas that wait to be thought, to be spoken and acted upon. inventions are waiting to be discovered. i don’t necessarily mean world-revolutionary inventions, but unique solutions in your business and in your situation. more often we should start expectantly with a blank paper when we try to solve problems. we should learn to think outside the usual ways. man has an unique ability to be creative and we should deliberatively harness that capacity. we need creativity in this time, don’t we? coming together – a key i believe one of the reasons of the lack of ideas is that we don’t come together and think together. some ideas can only be birthed in a group or community. there can really be a magic in the middle. what do i mean by that? there is a higher level of creativity when a group of people with different backgrounds and experiences joins together and in openness, curiosity and humility work together. we can be creative partners if we listen to each other and build together. an utopia? i don’t think so. it is a cultural question. if we continue to push in this direction of cooperation it will open up. it is a common opinion that competition spurs development, but what about cooperation? what if there is an even higher gear to put in? let’s explore this ground! the company that manages to build a feeling of community among the employees will likely be prosperous. generosity i believe we don’t have to be afraid that someone will steal our idea, because there are more ideas to be found. when we jealously hold on to our ideas we stagnate, but when we share we get more. i believe that generosity and creativity goes hand in hand. let’s cooperate. let’s create opportunities for creative conversations. what is your comment? how have you experienced creative conversations? how can we make room for them? is it naive to think business can thrive by generosity in today’s world? other posts about this subject you might want to read: being touched deeply humanness and conversation green world café cross-cultural conversations comments no comments » categories thinking tags creativity , dialogue comments rss trackback national economics studies august 21, 2009 | 7:57 am my work with system dynamics triggered an interest in the broad perspectives of economy. almost everything we do is affected by economic thinking or activity, whether we like it or not. and if we want to change how things operate, economic incentives are powerful. economics course because of this awakened interest i will take courses in national economics the coming two terms. the courses will touch on micro- and macroeconomics, international and political economics. i would like to move inside the economic thinking and understand the underlying models and assumptions . i felt the best way for me to do that was to steep myself in economics with an open and curious mind; a better alternative than just peek into it with preconceived ideas. i have started reading the course literature (parkin, economics for example) and i can’t avoid noticing the authors’ enthusiasm and faith in the market economy principles. reinforces itself you could think of the economic principles of supply and demand (adam smith) and model of the “economic man” that acts out of self-interest as facts; “this is how reality and man is”. or perhaps “this is a very true model of reality”. this way of thinking developed over time and formed a culture inhabited with people that acts according to it. institutions like stock markets, banks etc that supports the economic paradigm have evolved and shaped the way man thinks and act. things work the way they do because we have made them to work that way. it is hard to tell what is cause and what is effect. the thinking reinforces itself. it produces people that behaves accordingly, like a self-fulfilling prophecy. we stand in the middle of this universe we have created and believe that this is the natural way the world operates. part of a something greater the economic principles are part of a dynamic social system and we have the possibilities to influence it and change it. some say that economics should be considered by itself, separate from other areas. perhaps that is true; you simplify and make it understandable. but this dividing up and analytical approach is also an assumption and just one approach. it will be very interesting to go deeper into economics with a system perspective. we can work on uncovering the hidden assumptions, combining ideas and promoting a holistic perspective. solving problems – economic incentives i am very interested in how you can make policy changes the most effective way. if you have situation where people act in a certain way and you want to change it, what are the leverage points, the most efficient areas to alter? economic incentives are likely to come up often. how do we solve problems? we can have dreams about sustainability, but how can we actually make them come true? understanding the economics part of the system is truly important . so wish me good luck on this journey! i will report as i proceed. other posts about similar things you might want to read: me, a student systems dynamics learnings so far comments no comments » categories personal , thinking tags economics , learning , systems thinking comments rss trackback survival strategies august 16, 2009 | 1:15 pm i have recently returned from a one-week trekking in the mountains in the company of my oldest son mattias and my dog viggo. we visited the area west of abisko in the very north of sweden. it was really an adventure with many experiences of the greatness of nature. as a preparation for the trip (just for fun) i read and thought a little about survival strategies. what are the most important patterns that make people survive when they get into trouble; a plane crash, a catastrophe or when they get lost in unknown territory. those who survive shipwrecks, plane crashes, natural disasters and prison camps are those who are open to the changing nature of their environment, according to many psychologists. the survivors are those who notice that something changes around them and adapt accordingly. each one of us live with a mental model of the world, psychologists say. we see what we expect to see. we see what makes sense and what makes sense is what matches your mental model. more or less unconsciously we find reasons to exclude the information that might contradict our inner world instead of updating our view. here comes the insidious thing. when things change around us, we don’t notice it. when the unexpected happens, we move on as usual or sit down denying the facts. we have a tendency to anticipate and predict the future based on our mental model and that puts us in trouble. we have this false sense that we are always in control. at one point in abisko we were a bit disoriented and were slightly on the wrong path. the landscape before us didn’t match the map as we expected. this happened at the end of the day. we had just finished a difficult passage and were hungry and tired, expecting an easy route to our next stop. we had to pause, eat some snacks (important!) and reorient, updating our mental image of our position. we could easily have continued for miles in the wrong direction, but luckily we didn’t. psychologists say survivors more than others allow new information to reshape their mental model. they admit reality, accept it and work with it. they are open and curious. this rule is obvious in the nature. those animals that adapt to changing environment survive and those who don’t become extinct. people who are rule followers don’t do as well as those who are of independent mind and spirit. survivors question everything, sometimes annoyingly. trekking is a great way to learn to be a better observer. you have to look at what is around you and intelligently compare it to the map. when you walk in isolated parts of the country, losing your way can be unpleasant. this keeps you alert. you also have to look back every once in a while and memorize how your past path looks, because you might be forced to turn back. thankfully, we can learn to live aware and open. we ought to nourish our curiosity constantly and question what is happening. perhaps it is a just matter of relearning, since no one is more observant and adaptive than a small child. this observant and adaptive lifestyle might save our life one day. comments no comments » categories personal , thinking tags mindfulness , nature , pics , trekking comments rss trackback crossing the border – art and design august 9, 2009 | 2:10 pm playing music this year i celebrate 10 years as bass player. i haven’t blogged much about bass playing or music lately, but my band is quite active and keeps on playing at restaurants and parties in our region. i started with music because i wanted to try something new. i had no particular experience from younger years and it was scary in the beginning. all the other guys in the band had several years of experience, but all turned out very well. learning new things this musical journey did something for my life, besides giving me a fun hobby. it showed me the possibilities and the joy of learning new things. it is easy to get stuck with the things you master or are familiar with. you operate safely within known limits. dare to step out! this will keep your life fresh: every once in a while launch out into unfamiliar territory. i challenge the view that the older you get, the harder it is to learn something new! wholeness another thing bass playing did for me, was to open my eyes to wholeness and systems thinking. this may sound strange to you, but it is true. music is primarily a right-brain activity and much of the ability to see the whole resides there. my first approach to playing music was a typical left-brain approach. i learned what to play piece by piece. my “linear” mind was very present in every step. i kept myself like to a rail road track. but as i moved on i found something different. i noticed that there could be a creative flow, birthed in each moment in which i could express myself. together with other musicians you are part of a whole and your flowing together creates music. the whole is more than the sum of the parts. this is an incredible interesting area. i believe that by participating in musical activity you nourish your own ability to understand and navigate in the systems that surrounds us, a much needed ability in these days. and art? giving attention to music opened up a new perspective for me. it enhanced other areas in my life, like creativity and problem solving. some time ago i asked myself; what if i push this a little further? music is just one form of creative expressions. i suffer from a slight degree of colour-blindness (green-red). one day i realized that i hadn’t really paid attention to (man-made) art and design because of that. when it came to design i often let someone else do the work. i chose to handle the functional and practical aspect. i have always enjoyed nature. walking slowly, just looking at all the beauty around is so refreshing. but man-made art has been a white spot. going further i said to myself; what new perspectives will open up if i start to pay attention to form, colour and beauty. perhaps there is a border possible to cross here. so i started paying attention and you know what …here is new, exciting territory i haven’t visited before. fascinating! it is strange how you can look at things and don’t really see. art has been an inseparable part of human history for as long as we know. music is one of the expressions of the heart of man and art is the same. it is like a palette with many colours. i believe that art is a very necessary part of our culture and of our lives. i am not limited by my background or by already discovered natural talents or absence of talents. who am i? i am crossing a border. i am changing. anybody out there doing this journey also? other posts about this subject you might want to read: musicians and systems thinking comments 1 comment » categories music , personal , thinking tags art , systems thinking comments rss trackback thomas johnson on lean thinking may 27, 2009 | 7:59 pm today i read an interesting article in the march issue of systems thinker . it is titled a systemic path to lean management by thomas johnson. he exposes the heart of toyota’s lean thinking and why so many have failed to follow their example. businesses have achieved temporary improvements, but the long term average for most of them has not been satisfying. toyota on the other hand has managed to continuously improve their performance over a long time. go deeper what is the difference? the reason for failure is, according to johnson, that the lean practitioners do not go deep enough and change their underlying thinking. the followers emulate, but does not see the system change needed. most managers believe that to increase output they can manipulate the separate parts of the business operation independently. the prevalent idea is that the financial results is an linear addition of the contribution of the parts. a company could almost be condensed to, expressed in and controlled by a spreadsheet of financial results. the company is viewed as a machine. when the management try to improve financial results, they will probably destroy relationships; the core of true business. they might have short term improvements, but the results will be devastating in the long run. this way of thinking of a company is influenced by the old concepts of physics about mechanical processes and has been erroneously transferred to social systems. a living social system this is not the toyota way, according to johnson. they build their business as a system that itself naturally produces results. business is most of all a human living social system, a system of relationships and improvement lies in nurturing and reinforcing the system of relationships that produces the desired results, ultimately for the customers. accounting johnson challenges the usual management accounting practises, by saying that one-dimensional quantities can only describe a living system. they cannot successfully be used to explain what is going on or used to control multidimensional interactions going on in the business. toyota dispenses with the usual production control and accounting control for daily operation. they do it differently. johnson says: the prevalence of management accounting control systems in american business probably contributes more than any single thing to the confusion of levels that causes managers to believe they can run operations mechanically by chasing financial targets, not by nurturing and improving the underlying system of human relationships from which such results emerge. this is very interesting stuff, isn’t it? lean thinking and systems thinking, hand in hand. it deserves a closer look, especially how toyota implements it. does johnson have a too idealistic view of toyota? he continues to discuss this subject in profit beyond measure . this book ended up in my wish list at amazon immediately. comments 4 comments » categories uncategorized tags accounting control , leadership , lean thinking , management , systems thinking comments rss trackback sd: structure produces behaviour may 23, 2009 | 9:46 pm trust in a relationship when we got married some 26 years ago, someone gave us the advice to say “i love you” every day. it was a simple recipe and we started doing that; saying positive, encouraging and loving words to each other every day. this formed a habit, which our children eventually got into also. sometimes we don’t feel a thing, but we keep on saying it anyway. it gets easier and is more powerful when trust has been built up for some years. it is like investing in the future. we have had our ups and downs, but this simple habit has been a cornerstone in building a warm and lasting relationship which means a lot to me. nowadays when i come home after a troublesome day, i just need a couple of minutes cooking dinner together to get on the right side again. we have trust and the words of my wife have deep effect. structure this simple story could be expressed in system dynamics (sd) concepts. a habit is a pattern, consisting of reoccurring similar events and resulting consequences. the consequences feeds back and affect the type of event that caused it. these patterns form a dynamic structure, intangible in this case but none the less very real. this structure was formed over some time and as established it now has almost a life of its own. it affects the surrounding environment. system dynamics is a way to describe behaviour that change over time. it is like an abstract language, with a terminology that naturally explains what is happening around us. abstractions and models of the real world can be more or less fitting. in system terminology the above could be described as below. a simple model encouraging, positive words affects change of trust which makes trust increase. trust is like a bathtub and change of trust is like the faucet controlling the flow of water. the arrow going out from trust symbolizes that negative words drain trust. with positive words, trust accumulates over time. in the model there is also a relationship between trust back to change of trust, meaning that as trust increases, words have bigger effect. this feedback reinforces the increase of trust. remember that this is a simple model to illustrate the concepts of system dynamics. different perspective what difference does it make to describe the situation this way? we are typically not trained to see patterns over time, feedbacks or accumulations and this lack of perspective brings us into trouble. we try to change a situation and and are surprised as it becomes worse. when something goes wrong we look for someone to blame, but the truth is that we together have created a structure that produces the behaviour, good and bad. our thinking, deeply affected by media, is short-sighted and focuses on simple event-cause relationships and details. smarter navigation what difference does it make to know about dynamics? if we are conscious of these principles we can purposely design or redesign structures around us for the better. if we cannot manage the system, we can at least navigate in a smarter way. if we realize the above structure in a relationship, we understand that it takes time to build trust and that we have to be patient. trust is a stock and is very valuable. it shouldn’t easily be thrown away. comments no comments » categories personal , thinking tags flow , model , relationship , stock , system dynamics basics , systems dynamics comments rss trackback « previous entries subscribe your email: recent posts system dynamics course again absorbing variety what i offer tell me your story coming together – creating ideas recent comments joseph moroni on world of showers anders on tell me your story josette murnan on tell me your story price of silver today on applying systems thinking senaida mercadante on sounds anders on system dynamics course again henry on system dynamics course again websites directory on crossing the border – art and design archives select month march 2010 (1) september 2009 (2) august 2009 (5) may 2009 (4) april 2009 (1) february 2009 (4) january 2009 (4) december 2008 (3) november 2008 (3) october 2008 (4) september 2008 (4) august 2008 (2) june 2008 (5) may 2008 (2) april 2008 (7) march 2008 (3) february 2008 (1) november 2007 (6) october 2007 (9) september 2007 (5) august 2007 (8) july 2007 (2) june 2007 (4) may 2007 (2) april 2007 (3) march 2007 (7) february 2007 (9) january 2007 (4) december 2006 (3) november 2006 (1) october 2006 (4) september 2006 (2) august 2006 (9) june 2006 (3) may 2006 (9) april 2006 (1) electric bass bass player’s lowdown green permaculture the world resources institute transition towns wiser earth world changing new ideas fast company ted – ideas worth spreading wired software code better infoq serverside.com thinking berkana institute isee systems mental model musings mit sloan faculty pegasus communications society for organizational learning stockholm resilience centre tällberg foundation world cafe meta log in entries rss comments rss wordpress.org categories electric bass green leadership music personal software thinking uncategorized tags accounting control activism agile art bass technique cognition colonialism compassion creativity dialogue diversity economics feedback flow gaming inner life leadership lean thinking learning mana management mindfulness model nature pics project management reading reflection relationship resilience reviews scrum service design simulation social media software stock system dynamics basics systems dynamics systems thinking the world cafe trekking videos weinberg writing

URL analysis for vesterberg.se

http://www.vesterberg.se/category/thinking/
http://www.vesterberg.se/tag/systems-dynamics/
http://www.vesterberg.se/tag/writing/
http://www.vesterberg.se/feed/
http://www.vesterberg.se/2009/02/16/mit-opencourseware-sd-lecture-notes/
http://www.vesterberg.se/tag/reflection/
http://www.vesterberg.se/tag/project-management/
http://www.vesterberg.se/tag/dialogue/
http://www.vesterberg.se/2010/03/21/system-dynamics-course-again/feed/
http://www.vesterberg.se/2009/08/24/coming-together-creating-ideas/
http://www.vesterberg.se/2010/03/21/system-dynamics-course-again/trackback/

http://www.vesterberg.se/tag/social-media/
http://www.vesterberg.se/comments/feed/
http://www.vesterberg.se/2009/09/21/absorbing-variety/#comments
http://www.vesterberg.se/tag/nature/
amazon.co.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

# Copyright (c) 1997- IIS (The Internet Foundation In Sweden).
# All rights reserved.
# The information obtained through searches, or otherwise, is protected
# by the Swedish Copyright Act (1960:729) and international conventions.
# It is also subject to database protection according to the Swedish
# Copyright Act.
# Any use of this material to target advertising or
# similar activities is forbidden and will be prosecuted.
# If any of the information below is transferred to a third
# party, it must be done in its entirety. This server must
# not be used as a backend for a search engine.
# Result of search for registered domain names under
# the .se top level domain.
# This whois printout is printed with UTF-8 encoding.
#
state: active
domain: vesterberg.se
holder: andves0702-00005
admin-c: -
tech-c: -
billing-c: -
created: 2005-12-29
modified: 2017-11-03
expires: 2018-12-29
nserver: ns.aname.net
nserver: ns2.aname.net
nserver: ns3.aname.se
dnssec: unsigned delegation
status: ok
registrar: SE Direkt

  REFERRER http://www.nic-se.se

  REGISTRAR NIC-SE

SERVERS

  SERVER se.whois-servers.net

  ARGS vesterberg.se

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DISCLAIMER
Copyright (c) 1997- IIS (The Internet Foundation In Sweden).
All rights reserved.
The information obtained through searches, or otherwise, is protected
by the Swedish Copyright Act (1960:729) and international conventions.
It is also subject to database protection according to the Swedish
Copyright Act.
Any use of this material to target advertising or
similar activities is forbidden and will be prosecuted.
If any of the information below is transferred to a third
party, it must be done in its entirety. This server must
not be used as a backend for a search engine.
Result of search for registered domain names under
the .se top level domain.
This whois printout is printed with UTF-8 encoding.


DOMAIN

STATUS
active
ok

  NAME vesterberg.se

  CREATED 2005-12-29

  EXPIRES 2018-12-29

NSERVER

  NS.ANAME.NET 195.35.82.101

  NS2.ANAME.NET 89.221.245.42

  NS3.ANAME.SE 195.35.82.105

OWNER

  HANDLE andves0702-00005

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .